SYSTEM: ACTIVE
NIST SP 800-86

AI-ASSISTEDDIGITALFORENSICS

 

Volatile MemoryTimeline ReconstructionAnomaly DetectionExplainable AI
DFIR_PORTAL_v3.6
SYS_OK: 100%ALERTS: 0
CPU INTEL32.4%
RAM VOLATILE MATRIX112.5 GB / 512 GB
TRAFFIC VELOCITY4,890 Pkt/s
PHASE 1: ACQUIRING DISK TELEMETRY0%
EVIDENCE PARSED24,500
DIAGNOSTIC_LOGGER
Scroll to explore

The Problem Space

The Crisis in Cybercrime Investigation

Traditional forensic triage cannot cope with the sheer volume of data generated during security breaches. Let's look at the numbers.

The Investigator's Dilemma

  • 01.Thousands of logs are generated every single minute across active compromised hosts.
  • 02.Gigabytes of network telemetry must be captured, parsed, and searched in real time.
  • 03.Volatile RAM artifacts decay quickly or are lost completely during emergency system reboots.
  • 04.Timeline correlation requires connecting subtle indicators across independent, dispersed environments.

Why AI Changes Everything

  • Sub-second Detection: Machine learning baselines identify complex outliers in milliseconds instead of days.
  • Campaign Mapping: Instantly clusters similar threat indicators using multi-dimensional distance metrics.
  • Bayesian Correlating: Computes the mathematically sound likelihood of intrusion, mitigating alert fatigue by 70%.
  • Explainable Integrity: Generates structured, court-admissible audit summaries mapping back to raw bytes.

Live Global Security Portal

Active Cyber Threat Index Map

Interactive cyber threat monitoring illustrating real-time malware waves, intrusions, and security telemetry feeds across global networks.

System Architecture

Modular 5-Layer Stack

End-to-end framework layers stacking from raw system volatile hardware collection up to incident reporting.

L5

Forensic Analyst Portal

Flask Dashboard · Kibana Timelines · PDF Exporter

Interactive web user interface displaying parsed cases, dynamic event search parameters, and MITRE ATT&CK mapping reports.

L4

AI Intelligence Engine

Gaussian Model · Bayesian Probability · Shannon Entropy

Runs GMM anomaly scans, Bayesian posterior updates, Shannon entropy byte checks, and Time-Series decompositions.

L3

Correlation & Threat Scoring

Bayesian Threat Confidence Score (TCS) Module

Weights diverse artifacts across hosts and calculates an automated threat score ranking most compromised targets.

L2

Forensic Analysis Modules

Volatility 3 · Autopsy CLI · Scapy PCAP parsing · YARA

Triggers volatility RAM decoders, parses disk registry hives, and parses network stream histories.

L1

Artifact Collection Engine

Logs · Memory dumps · Reg hives · Sysmon · Browser SQLite

Performs parallel automated extraction of all volatile and non-volatile evidence segments across target machines.

Target User Profiles

Forensic Investigators

Automated triage, memory carving, and timeline reconstruction.

Incident Response Teams

Active C2 beacon identification and lateral movement tracking.

SOC Security Analysts

Bayesian-driven telemetry correlation to reduce false positives.

Law Enforcement Units

Cryptographically checked reports aligned with legal admissibility.

Forensic Evidence Gathering

Comprehensive Collection Engine

The framework automates collection and parsing across nine distinct digital forensic artifact segments.

System Logs

Parses Windows Event Logs (.evtx), Linux syslog and auth logs using Python log normalizers and Elasticsearch ingestion pipelines.

Forensic Targets

Brute-force login signatures, privilege escalations, scheduled task creation, process spawning patterns.

Browser Web History

Extracts local browser profiles (Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Safari) using direct SQLite database decoders to reconstruct timeline traces.

Forensic Targets

Attacker reconnaissance history, phishing access vectors, cache structures, Cached Credential SQLite tables.

Windows Registry

Decrypts NTUSER.DAT, SYSTEM, SOFTWARE, SAM hives using Python python-registry modules to find persistent structures.

Forensic Targets

Persistence registries (Run/RunOnce keys), USB connection traces, shellbags, UserAssist executing timestamps.

Memory RAM Dumps

Automates Volatility 3 command plugin analysis to parse raw physical RAM dumps, recovering transient and fileless malware traces.

Forensic Targets

Active process listings (pslist/pstree), network sockets (netscan), injected DLL modules (malfind).

Network Packets (PCAP)

Inspects live packet structures or raw PCAPs utilizing Wireshark/tshark pipelines and Python Scapy decoders.

Forensic Targets

Command & Control beacon timing anomalies, DNS tunneling channels, large outbound exfiltrations.

File System Metadata

Performs file system integrity and MACB metadata scans using Autopsy pipelines and disk writing blockers.

Forensic Targets

Timestomping identification, files generated in %TEMP%/AppData, high-entropy packed directory segments.

Process Execution Traces

Decodes Windows Prefetch (.pf) files, AppCompatCache (Shimcache), Amcache registries, and Linux audit logs.

Forensic Targets

Historical process executions, execution path mismatches, program signatures run prior to automated deletion.

PowerShell & Shell Logs

Parses historical powershell scripts, transcript logs, and Linux bash/zsh shell histories.

Forensic Targets

Base64 encoded arguments, download cradles (IEX/Invoke-WebRequest), LOLBAS executions, mimikatz commands.

USB Device Registers

Queries system setupapi logs, udev properties, and Windows USBSTOR registry structures.

Forensic Targets

Removable drives, mounting serial numbers, timestamps, correlated file modifications in active windows.

AI Processing Core

Machine Learning Intelligence Engine

The framework utilizes six custom analytical methods. Toggle between the underlying LaTeX mathematics and real Python script implementations.

Evidence Evaluation

Bayesian Probability Network

Constructs probabilistic graphical models linking digital evidence — system logs, file modifications, network traffic — to investigation hypotheses. Calculates Likelihood Ratios (LR) quantifying the strength of evidence under prosecution vs. defense hypotheses. Integrates multi-source evidence and updates posterior threat scores in real-time.

BAYES_THEOREM
P(A | B) =
P(B | A) × P(A)P(B)
PERFORMANCE SCORESupports real-time posterior updates across 50+ evidence nodes
VALIDATION BASELINEPublished methodology: DFRWS 2024, IEEE S&P Workshop
Network Anomaly Detection

Gaussian Mixture Models

Models normal network behavior as a mixture of K Gaussian components, each representing a legitimate traffic cluster (DNS queries, HTTP sessions, SSH tunnels). Data points falling into low-probability density regions — unusual packet sizes, abnormal connection intervals, or rogue port usage — are flagged as anomalies.

GAUSSIAN_PDF
f(x) =
1σ √(2π)
e - (x - μ)² / 2σ²
PERFORMANCE SCOREK=8 components · AUC-ROC: 0.964 on CICIDS2017
VALIDATION BASELINEValidated against UNSW-NB15 and CIC-IDS2017 benchmarks
Behavioral Similarity

Euclidean Distance Metrics

Converts forensic activity records into multidimensional vectors (representing parameters like process count, network connections, file access rate). Matches observed behavior vectors against known attack campaign vectors using Euclidean Distance metrics to identify campaign matches.

EUCLIDEAN_METRIC
d = √ i=1..n (xi - yi
PERFORMANCE SCOREClassifies 14 ATT&CK techniques with <12% distance error
VALIDATION BASELINEFeature set aligned with EMBER malware dataset schema
Threat Classification

Logistic Regression Classifier

Binary classification model extracting features from PE headers (entropy, section count, import table size), API call sequences, and behavioral traces. Outputs calibrated probability scores for malicious classification. Explainable AI weights provide feature-level interpretability.

LOGISTIC_SIGMOID
P(Y = 1) =
11 + e - (b₀ + b₁x₁ + b₂x₂ + ...)
PERFORMANCE SCORE96.8% accuracy · F1: 0.971 · FPR: 0.023
VALIDATION BASELINEHyperparameter optimized on 250,000 malware specimens
Malware & Ransomware Identification

Shannon Entropy Analysis

Analyzes the statistical randomness of files and memory segments by mapping byte distributions. Encrypted, compressed, or packed malware payloads exhibit high Shannon Entropy, allowing detection of ransomware file actions and packed packers in memory.

SHANNON_ENTROPY
H(X) = - x ∈ X p(x) log₂ p(x)
PERFORMANCE SCOREShannon Range: 0.0 (structured text) to 8.0 (pure encrypted)
VALIDATION BASELINEResearch: High-entropy detection matches Ransomware within 3 blocks
Timeline Reconstruction

Time-Series Decomposition

Aggregates all timestamps from normalized forensic data logs (logs, system modifications, network PCAPs) and applies additive time-series decomposition to isolate trend, seasonal, and residual components.

TIME_SERIES_DECOMP
Xt = Tt + St + Rt
PERFORMANCE SCOREFilters daily noise, leaving raw residual spikes indicating attack windows
VALIDATION BASELINEAligned with DFRWS USA 2025 event reconstruction models

Framework Capabilities

Core System Features

Deep dive into the operational algorithms, scoring criteria, and threat taxonomies.

Bayesian Correlation

Threat Confidence Score (TCS)

A unified anomaly calculation summarizing observed anomalies across hosts using weighted threat probabilities.

0.0 – 0.3 · LOW RISKLEGITIMATE
0.3 – 0.6 · MEDIUM RISKTRIAGE REQUIRED
0.6 – 0.8 · HIGH RISKSENIOR ESCALATE
0.8 – 1.0 · CRITICALINCIDENT RESPONSE
TCS_CALCULUSTCS = ∑ (Evidence_Weight_i × Bayesian_Posterior_i) / Total_Evidence_Count
Security Standard Alignments

MITRE ATT&CK Tactic Detections

How detected system modifications map directly to standard MITRE Enterprise threat techniques.

ATT&CK TacticForensic DetectionFramework Action
Initial Access (TA0001) Phishing URL found in browser SQLite historyFlag domain + query mail IP
Execution (TA0002) PowerShell Base64 commands + YARA matchKill PID + RAM dump Volatility
Persistence (TA0003) New registry Run/RunOnce keys generatedRegistry snapshot restore
Privilege Escalation (TA0004) LSASS memory dump process patternsIsolate process + trigger RAM lock
Lateral Movement (TA0008) Atypical internal SMB/RDP socket sequencesQuarantine local gateway endpoint

Framework Ecosystem

Tools & Technologies

Industry-standard forensic suites integrated seamlessly with modern data engines and AI libraries.

Autopsy

Autopsy

Disk forensics & deleted file recovery

Volatility 3

Volatility 3

Memory forensics & RAM extraction

Wireshark

Wireshark

PCAP deep network protocol analyzer

Scapy

Scapy

Python automated packet parsing

YARA

YARA

Malware pattern matching rule engine

Suricata

Suricata

Real-time network intrusion IDS

Nmap

Nmap

Active host discovery & service mapping

TensorFlow

TensorFlow

LSTM deep learning anomaly detection

Scikit-learn

Scikit-learn

XGBoost, KNN, Isolation Forest tools

Pandas

Pandas

Log dataframe Normalizations & analytics

NumPy

NumPy

Mathematical calculations & entropy scales

Elasticsearch

Elasticsearch

Multi-source log indexing & fast search

Kibana

Kibana

Forensic dashboard timeline graphs

SQLite

SQLite

Case files & Browser DB parses

Docker

Docker

Isolated forensic sandbox pipelines

Flask / Django

Flask / Django

Forensic Portal REST APIs

Python

Python

Core pipeline execution script engine

Kali Linux

Kali Linux

Primary virtual forensic OS suite

7-Phase Stepper Workflow

How an Investigation Works

The lifecycle of a digital forensic analysis mapped out phase-by-phase through our automated pipeline.

PHASE DETAIL MONITOR

Phase 1: Identification

The framework is initialized using case parameters. The incident alert is evaluated (via SIEM logs, firewall events, or manual administrator trigger) to assess the scope of compromised systems, timestamp windows, and initial indicators.

PHASE STATUS: ACTIVE1 / 7 COMPLETED

Platform Vision

Future Expansion Roadmap

The expansion milestones planned to scale the AI-DFIR framework across automated operations.

Phase 1CURRENT

Enterprise Integrations

  • SIEM Split Connectors (Splunk, Sentinel)
  • AWS / GCP cloud log parsers
Phase 2PLANNED

Autonomous Containment

  • Sub-second network isolation playbooks
  • Ransomware active behavior kills
Phase 3PLANNED

Deep Memory Automation

  • Volatility 3 automatic carving loops
  • Dark Web IOC intelligence enrichment
Phase 4PLANNED

Post-Quantum Forensics

  • Quantum-resistant evidence hashing
  • National law enforcement nodes

Outcomes & Benchmarks

Traditional vs. AI-DFIR Impact

Quantified expected improvements comparing standard manual forensic methods against automated AI-DFIR pipelines.

Evidence Collection Time[1]95% Faster
Traditional Forensic Triage8 hours
AI-DFIR Orchestrated Pipeline20 mins
Log Review (10k entries)[2]99% Faster
Traditional Forensic Triage12 hours
AI-DFIR Orchestrated Pipeline5 mins
Timeline Reconstruction[3]95% Faster
Traditional Forensic Triage3 days
AI-DFIR Orchestrated Pipeline1 hour
False Positive Alert Rates[1]75% Drop
Traditional Forensic Triage40%
AI-DFIR Orchestrated Pipeline9%
Forensic Report Compiles[2]96% Faster
Traditional Forensic Triage8 hours
AI-DFIR Orchestrated Pipeline15 mins

Interested in this
research?

Let's discuss the forensic framework, the ML models behind it, or how AI-driven investigation can be applied to your DFIR workflow. Open to research collaborations, speaking engagements, and consulting.